| 187126224761_506160007784 | Antonio Mancuso |
|
On Monday 11 August 2003 07:22 pm, Hare, Matthew wrote:
I have two systems running SuSE Linux. System 1 is running SuSE 7.1
with the 2.2.18 kernel. System 2 is running SuSE 7.3 with the
2.4.17 |
|
|   |
| 146522494951_592960007744 | Nagendra Singh Tomar |
|
I just downloaded 2.6.0-test2 from kernel.org to try the latest TSO
facility. I am having an intel 82545 card.
02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 01) |
|
|   |
| 160026304688_578660007900 | Brian Buesker |
|
Check this out, this is helpful..
Why buy your bank manager a new car?
We blast your debt and give you a fresh start!
- Save you a lot of money by eliminating late fees
- Settle your accounts for a |
|
|   |
| 157529924774_512060007546 | Sudharsan Vijayarag |
|
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:44:11 -0700
Brian Buesker <bbuesker@qualcomm.com wrote:
Summary: When a send of a UDP packet over IPv6 triggers an IPSec SA to
be established via IKE, the sendto call |
|
|   |
| 170625964152_532960007873 | Nivedita Singhvi |
|
Hi,
Ive a Problem with some TCP Connections on IPv6. The Connection
suddenly hangs and after some time there is a "Connection reset by
peer". The problem shows up when using rsync. The Ke |
|
|   |
| 127530004494_503560007211 | Krzysztof Olx119dzki |
|
Hi Nivedita,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:54:54PM -0700, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
Ive a Problem with some TCP Connections on IPv6. The Connection
suddenly hangs and after some time there is a &qu |
|
|   |
| 182025254461_577060007102 | David S Miller |
|
It seems that cryptoapi usage wrt mm is not safe. At least both ipsec
and cryptoloop practise these kinds of things :
example from net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c
int
skb_to_sgvec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct |
|
|   |
| 151420544733_520160007926 | David S Miller |
|
The patch below kills an occurence of the obsolete EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS
from drivers/net/meth.c in 2.6.0-test3.
--- linux-2.6.0-test3-not-full/drivers/net/meth.c.old 2003-08-09 21:08:10.000000000 +020 |
|
|   |
| 110124154918_587660007767 | Jose Luis Domingo Lo |
|
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has tested the IPSec functionality in
conjunction with NAT for the Linux 2.6 kernel ? with/without VLAN thrown
in.
Over the weekend I will need to do a lot of kernel |
|
|   |
| 142122414363_557360007491 | Adrian Bunk |
|
Hello,
I dont quite understand the comment, and the logic following it, in inet_select_addr() function.
Specifically:
1. How is it guranteed that a loopback address is not chosen? (there is no che |
|
|   |
| 144628464490_594060007551 | Prashanth T |
|
Hello Adrian,
Thank you very much for your interest in SysKonnect products.
We will consider your suggestion during the next release.
Thank you again for your cooperation.
Best regards
Karim
Sys |
|
|   |
| 115127004076_561260007530 | Eble Dan |
|
Where can I get information on programming at the
ethernet packet level under RH8 and RH9?
Thanks,
Mike.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vge |
|
|   |
| 171529844585_544860007425 | Herbert Xu |
|
Hi:
Doing some tests with 2.6.0-test2-mm2 and IPv6 over IPv4 tunnels I come
across the error message in the subject:
dardhal:~# ip tunnel add sixbone mode sit remote 64.71.xxx.xxx local 213.0.xxx.x |
|
|   |
| 137322864840_529160007375 | Herbert Xu |
|
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:37:13 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
This patch adds an inner family field to all userspace structures for
SAs and templates. This is needed to a |
|
|   |
| 105825824617_542160007187 | Herbert Xu |
|
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:41:07 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:45:27PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
Two quick questions:
1) One speci |
|
|   |
| 191326014032_540360007913 | Herbert Xu |
|
Hello!
The IPv6 over IPv4 case is basically the same as an SIT tunnel over
ESP transport mode except of course you have the usual goodies that
come with tunnel mode IPSEC.
Interprotocol |
|
|   |
| 195426914613_502960007082 | Herbert Xu |
|
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:42:11PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
Any more ABI breakers? Seriously, I have to freeze things up very
soon, so if there is something we have to accomodate that you k |
|
|   |
| 156020174066_514460007251 | David S Miller |
|
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:22:59PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:47:09PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
so we rush on the linux ipsec abi now because of redhat relea |
|
|   |
| 156928394537_540960007698 | Maciej W Rozycki |
|
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:37:13 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
This patch adds an inner family field to all userspace structures for
SAs and templates.
Patch applied, than |
|
|   |
| 178421884279_540060007434 | Eble Dan |
|
Hi,
I am very new to Linux networking and am having a
problem with routing.
I have 2 machines connected to the internet one
running WinXP and other running RH8.0.
Both are configured with DHCP. The |
|
|   |
| 158725214035_561960007575 | Jonathon Ross |
|
Hello !
I have a system with 256 MB RAM and am running
Linux-2.4.19 on it. I am running netperf with sendfile
on two Gbe cards: Broadcom 5701 using the tg3 driver
and Intel 82544/82546. When running |
|
|   |
| 153228784266_514460007570 | David S Miller |
|
Ive got the solution to all your problems: dont use TCP. Your
application requirements (fine control of when packets are sent,
minimizing delay, custom congestion control) make it clear that what |
|
|   |
| 122624674587_529260007052 | David S Miller |
|
At 01:38 PM 6/08/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
|
|
|   |
| 154421804891_508060007021 | Daniele Bellucci |
|
Of course only packets get dropped. But thats beside the point.
If Im sending 20 byte packets, and linuxs congestion control kicks in, my
throughput is 20 bytes per RTT. If the client sends me 1 by |
|
|   |
| 177823734209_505760007819 | Jose Luis Domingo Lo |
|
On Tue 5 August 2003 16:30, Daniele Bellucci wrote:
Hi,
can anyone tellme why MOD_*_COUNT has disappeared in 2.5.x?
without MOD_*_COUNT i get an oops everytime i try to unload tun device
driv |
|
|   |
| 149223594340_552760007264 | Angelo DellAera |
|
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:08:23 +0200
"Angelo DellAera" <buffer@antifork.org wrote:
Looking at the sources it seems that ALL net drivers are affected by
this problem.
If net drivers |
|
|   |
| 110225104141_536960007048 | Angelo DellAera |
|
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 01:51:12 +0200
"Angelo DellAera" <buffer@antifork.org wrote:
I agree with you but you should agree with me that removing a
net driver while the NIC is generating |
|
|   |
| 193928814515_552560007126 | David S Miller |
|
A trivial patch against kernel 2.6.0-test2.
Regards,
Angelo DellAera
--- 82596.c.old 2003-08-05 02:17:51.000000000 +0200
+++ 82596.c 2003-08-05 02:19:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -1420,15 +1420,15 @ |
|
|   |
| 157827174307_546960007896 | Touko Korpela |
|
Hi all,
every time i try to unload my net device a WARMON is triggered in
kobject_cleanup() because of the missing "release" function in the following struct:
[net/core/net-sysfs.c:]
stati |
|
|   |
| 149025754269_569960007041 | sandy pond |
|
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:01:50PM -0700, Mark Huth wrote:
Did this exact same hardware work with an earlier driver/kernel???
No. But Im quite sure that my HW is physically OK.
It looks like t |
|
|   |
| 151721244401_585760007379 | Eble Dan |
|
00005E
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, sandy pond
wrote:
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 11:03:59 -0600
From: sandy pond <sandy_pond@myrealbox.com
To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Public MAC address |
|
|   |
| 112027544890_526260007544 | richml |
|
OUI 00005E is assigned to the IANA. Have they given permission to assign
these addresses locally?
-----Original Message-----
From: rich+ml@lclogic.com [ mailto:rich+ml@lclogic.com mailto:ric |
|
|   |
| 131020604425_582660007598 | Eble Dan |
|
Followup to: < msg08158.html AD59566A9D83864F871AE2E525030640050715@aimail.aiinet.priv
By author: "Eble, Dan" <DanE@aiinet.com
In newsgroup: linux.dev.net
OUI 00005E is a |
|
|   |
| 195321634315_525960007112 | Herbert Xu |
|
Dear all,
I have a question about "select" function in Linux.
In a simple client-server program using tcp socket, the server accepts
two client tcp request and does some processing by cal |
|
|   |
| 115521214688_542460007321 | Herbert Xu |
|
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 14:44:22 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
The various XFRM messages that return information generate spurious
NLMSG_ERROR messages. This patch fixes t |
|
|   |
| 146523384445_586760007097 | Daniel Ritz |
|
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 14:42:46 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
I found that XFRM ALLOCSPI used the selector addresses isntead of the
SA addresses when creating the new SA. |
|
|   |
| 124623154851_513560007974 | Herbert Xu |
|
Looks like CONFIG_INET_IPCOMP=y needs CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
| CC net/ipv4/ipcomp.o
| In file included from net/ipv4/ipcomp.c:24:
| include/net/esp.h: In function `esp_hmac_digest:
| include/n |
|
|   |
| 168028894033_510460007620 | David S Miller |
|
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Looks like CONFIG_INET_IPCOMP=y needs CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
Does it help if you remove the inclusio |
|
|   |
| 170226674783_501760007415 | David S Miller |
|
fixes a mem leak in esp6_input() in the error paths. and return -ENOMEM,
not -EINVAL when out of memory. against 2.6.0-test2-bk
--- 1.19/net/ipv6/esp6.c Mon Jul 21 02:46:12 2003
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ |
|
|   |
| 113020804537_581860007358 | Herbert Xu |
|
Hello,
Ive gotten an oops three times now in about 24 hours while sending stuff
over the VPN router through the linux box. The second-last time I was too
lazy to copy down all the information, but |
|
|   |
| 113829704696_558460007891 | Peter Johanson |
|
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:31:11 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
Thats my fault. I didnt check the existence of encap parameters
before copying them. This patch should fix |
|
|   |
| 168120824206_553260007784 | Antoine Luu |
|
One of the -mm patches produces a warning which will be taken care of later when
all the network drivers are converted to dynamically allocating net_devices.
At that point, a massive patch will be ne |
|
|   |
| 150528984673_553960007386 | Sergey V Burchu |
|
|
|
|   |
| 115827054053_594260007979 | Sergey V Burchu |
|
Start looking from tcp_v4_lookup/udp_v4_lookup
tomar
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sergey V. Burchu wrote:
Hello!
Im looking for the way to look through the list of all active sockets
inside the ke |
|
|   |
| 135728524058_589460007563 | Sashikiran Rachakond |
|
Have you tried "man netstat" and "man lsof" ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey V. Burchu [ mailto:sayd@joker.botik.ru mailto:sayd@joker.botik.ru ]
Sent: Friday, |
|
|   |
| 125128084533_594760007369 | Antoine Luu |
|
netstat -p
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Eble, Dan wrote:
Have you tried "man netstat" and "man lsof" ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey V. Burchu [ mailto:sayd@ |
|
|   |
| 183820734452_504360007670 | Antoine Luu |
|
Antoine Luu <aluu@cse.ogi.edu wrote:
Hi,
I try to understand how are set and read the ip options in the kernel,
and I find something that I can understand in the function
ip_options_com |
|
|   |
| 182821094568_550060007570 | Zhao Forrest |
|
I am reading linux tcp codes, and I encountered some
questions, would somebody there help to explain?
thanks.
in tcp_ipv4.c, function tcp_v4_conn_request(),
there are statements like:
------------- |
|
|   |
| 188728074274_594060007997 | Zhao Forrest |
|
Hi, Alexey
Id like to give the psudo code to describe my proposed way to handle
the PMTU message for IPSec/IPv4. Welcome your comment!
1 add a new data field "u32 pmtu" to struct xfrm_sta |
|
|   |
| 191821044849_597760007518 | quotphasedquot |
|
I am modifying linux kernel 2.4.18 to add support for our TCP offload
card. The problem is:
The packets that I get from the card are fully TCP processed and in-order.
Now I feed these packets to ne |
|
|   |